This is the Final Publication of the OCSRI Conservation Plan.

OCSRI Conservation Plan
Final 3/10/97
Chapter 12

Oregon Coastal Salmon Restoration Initiative


Chapter 12

Accountability and Coordination of Effort Among Contributors

The actions of government alone are not sufficient to conserve and restore salmon across the landscape. Oregon's Conservation Plan recognizes that conservation and restoration of coho and other species must be accomplished by local communities and landowners, with local knowledge of problems and ownership in solutions. Watershed councils, soil and water conservation districts, the OSU Cooperative Extension Service, and other grassroots efforts are vehicles for getting the work done. State and federal agencies and programs will provide the regulatory foundation and technical support to the watershed councils, but the bulk of the work needed to conserve and restore watersheds will be accomplished by local people.

State and federal agencies are responsible for many management programs and the administration of statutes and rules that fundamentally affect natural resources, including the following:

Previously, agencies often conducted business independently. Salmon suffered because their life cycles cross the physical and jurisdictional boundaries of all of these agencies. They suffered because they were affected by the actions of all agencies, but no single agency was responsible for comprehensive, life-cycle management. Under Oregon's Plan, all state and federal agencies that have an impact on salmon are held accountable for conducting business in a coordinated manner that is consistent with the conceptual foundation and the goals and strategies of the OCSRI.

Leadership

To date, the essential mechanism in Oregon's Conservation Plan has been the Governor's leadership. It has brought management agencies and affected stakeholders together to develop solutions to long-standing problems. The OCSRI Plan recognizes that leadership of this nature is essential to achieving the goals of the Conservation Plan. While the institutional arrangements that allowed salmon to decline will not be resolved quickly, effective leadership has the best opportunity to resolve the inherent conflicts that exist. Maintaining momentum in Oregon's Coastal Salmon Restoration Initiative hinges on continued leadership of state agencies and coordination with federal agencies. This essential leadership will be maintained through the Governor's role with the Salmon Strategy Team and a legislative oversight committee.

Focused Coordination Infrastructure

The Conservation Plan will be implemented through an infrastructure that includes both focused and diffuse elements. Focused elements include the following:

Diffuse Coordination Infrastructures

Much of the work essential to conservation and restoration of Oregon's salmon populations will be accomplished through the efforts of local watershed councils, soil and water conservation districts, private and industrial landowners, and similar grassroots efforts. Technical support, scientific expertise, and access to relevant data will be provided by state and federal agencies and the OSU Cooperative Extension Service.

Recovery of salmonids will require coordination among all interests at unprecedented levels. Salmonids are distributed over a wide range of habitats that interact with an equally broad array of local, state, federal, and international institutions.

As a direct result of the OCSRI, coordination of efforts is currently occurring at unprecedented levels in Oregon. This coordination includes the participation of government, industry, conservation organizations, Oregon State University, local organizations, and citizens. A commitment by these parties to communicate and coordinate has been sustained throughout the process of development of the Conservation Plan.

Many day-to-day working relationships have been created through this process, and many more have been strengthened. Like ecosystems, socio-political systems are complex, and there will always be room for improved coordination. For example, streamlining technical and financial assistance is needed to improve efficiency in the delivery of grassroots and government restoration actions. Ideally, state and federal grants that support grassroots efforts will be delivered through a streamlined application and review process. Maintaining and creating critical coordination processes and infrastructures will remain a priority of the Plan. Examples of a diffuse coordination infrastructure include the following:

Continuing Role of NMFS

NMFS will annually evaluate Oregon's progress toward goals to determine whether coho or other species should be listed or de-listed under the federal ESA. NMFS will review recommendations of the Independent Scientific Assessment Team and the coordinated monitoring program annual report to assess whether management measures proposed under Oregon's Coastal Salmon Restoration Initiative Plan are accomplished as promised. Evidence that state partners are deficient in taking action, or that the status of salmon stocks or supporting habitats have not improved, will be considered a basis for NMFS to establish a listing.


Return to top of page.
Go to Table of Contents page.
Go to Home page.

Created April 4, 1997
Web Page Construction: Janet Demaris (503) 378-3397 x 234