Oregon Coastal Salmon Restoration Initiative |
"Core areas" are stream reaches (including their connected
sub-basins) or watersheds within individual coastal basins that
currently support relatively high densities of spawning and/or
rearing. Therefore, they are of critical importance to the persistence
of salmon populations that inhabit the basin. These reaches or
basins have been provisionally identified on maps to provide information
that can help agencies, watershed councils, soil and water conservation
districts, and landowners prioritize efforts to conserve and restore
habitats that support salmon.
Core area maps have been developed for all of the larger coastal
basins, noting core areas for coho, chinook, chum, and steelhead.
These maps represent an effort to build on previous attempts
to identify areas that are especially important to salmonid production
and the maps are expected to evolve as new and better information
becomes available. A description of the mapping process and a
schedule for revising the provisional maps are included in Chapter
15.
Maps of provisionally identified core areas are being distributed
to watershed councils, soil and water conservation districts,
agencies, and interested landowners. These maps provide a basis
for beginning to prioritize conservation and restoration efforts,
but do not dictate assignment of priority for action or investment
of funds.
Core areas will be used or applied through several strategies:
In addition to these strategies, a number of significant agency
actions/measures have been either prioritized toward or specifically
directed at habitat within core areas. Two key issues have been
raised about physical habitat protection within core areas: riparian
protection and road-sediment risks. These two issues have been
specifically addressed through core area measures on forest lands.
Riparian protection and road-sediment risk on forest land are
regulated through the Oregon Forest Practices Act and related
administrative rules. The rules establish a desired future condition
for riparian vegetation. For most fish-bearing streams, the desired
future condition is to grow and maintain stands similar to "mature
forest conditions" within riparian management areas of specified
widths. These various widths represent approximately 70 to 95
percent of the potential source area for large woody debris recruitment,
respectively. For non-fish-bearing streams, the desired future
condition is to grow and retain vegetation sufficient to support
the functions and processes that are important to downstream waters,
which have fish, maintain the quality of domestic water, and supplement
wildlife habitat across the landscape.
The prescriptions described in the rules have been designed to
meet the desired future conditions on average across the landscape.
However, the prescriptions are based upon some assumptions about
stand condition and growth and may not ideally address all site
conditions. Monitoring is in place to evaluate the adequacy of
the prescriptions and the assumptions upon which they were developed.
On OFIC member industrial lands in core areas and state forest
lands through western Oregon, a higher level of assurance of meeting
the desired future condition on a site-specific basis in the most
timely manner will be provided through several voluntary measures
that retain additional conifer within riparian areas along both
fish-bearing and non-fish-bearing streams.
Forest roads represent a high risk for increased sediment delivery
to streams. For roads and other activities that may be sediment
sources, the forest practice rules include state-of-the-art practices
that, when implemented, minimize sediment source and delivery.
However, many roads built prior to current practices retain
higher risks for sediment delivery than would be the case if the
roads had been constructed under the current standards of design.
The OCSRI Plan addresses the legacy of risk posed by forest
roads through an aggressive program to identify and correct potential
risk related to cut- and fill-slope failure, road surface drainage,
stream crossings and fish passage. It is expected that approximately
$130 million will be spent by industrial and state forest lands
over the next ten years to address the legacy road issue. Emphasis
of this effort will be given to roads within core area watersheds.
Measures related to core area protection are described briefly
below. These measures are described in more detail in the agency
workplans in Chapter 17C.
Actions/Measures Specific to Core Areas
ODF 8: Riparian hardwood conversions: Hardwood
conversions allowed under the FPA will require an additional review
process before implementation within core areas.
ODF 19: Additional conifer retention along fish-bearing
streams in core areas: OFIC members have voluntarily
agreed to harvest no more than 25 percent of the conifer that
are in excess of the standard basal area target in those situations
when the actual stocking in the RMA exceeds the standard target.
(Note: this will also be done on state forest land, but is not
exclusive to core areas.)
ODF 20: Limited RMA for small type N streams in core
areas: OFIC members will establish limited RMAs of
20 feet for small type N streams for the purpose or retaining
snags and downed wood.
ODF 22: 25 percent in-unit leave tree placement and
additional voluntary retention: This is a voluntary measure
to retain up to 100 percent of the in-unit trees along Type N
or F streams. OFIC members will voluntarily change the ratio
of 50 percent conifer and 50 percent hardwood, to 75 percent conifer
and 25 percent hardwood when requested on a site-specific basis.
Priority Given to Implementation within Core Areas
DSL: Will review scattered tracts of State Land Board
lands to evaluate their coho habitat potential with priority to
parcels within core areas.
ODF 1: Road erosion and risk project: Industrial
forest landowners have agreed to implement a voluntary program
to identify risks from roads and to address those risks.
ODF 2: State forest lands road erosion and risk project:
State forest landowners have agreed to implement a voluntary
program on state-owned lands to identify risks from roads and
to address those risks.
ODFW-I.B.2 and ODF 4: Stream habitat assessments:
For the last three years, industrial forest landowners and
state forest lands have contracted with ODFW to complete stream
habitat surveys following ODFW protocol.
Return to top of page.
Go to Table of Contents page.
Go to Home page.
Created April 4, 1997
Web Page Construction: Janet Demaris (503) 378-3397 x 234